Design notes on Send/Receive
This page is for documentation related to btrfs send/receive.
Btrfs send/receive is currently stable. It was merged in the main Linux repository in 3.6. The initial version of send/receive was posted to the list here (btrfs-progs part here).
Btrfs send/receive design
Only the send side is happening in-kernel. Receive is happening in user-space. The kernel generates a stream of instructions meant to be replayed 1:1 on the receiving side. These instructions cover the most important calls found for the vfs. Examples are create, mkdir, link, symlink, rename, unlink, write, and so on.
btrfs_compare_trees (ctree.c) is used to find the differences between two trees. It calls back a supplied callback with every tree item that differs between the two trees. See changed_cb from send.c for actions that take place for changed items.
Generating the instruction stream
Based on the differences found by btrfs_compare_tree, we generate a stream of instructions. The stream is ordered in inode order (not in the order a normal fs tree iteration would give!). This means, that we can't create files/dirs in their real/final places in most cases as the whole path may not exist yet. To handle this, we work on inode refs instead of directory items to determine where an inode should lie. There are a lot of situations where we can't link/move the inode into its final destination, for example when parts of the destination path do not exist yet. To handle this, we have "orphan inodes", which are inodes that have a temporary name in the root of the fs and wait for being linked/moved later. Orphan inodes are described later.
(Need to stop writing here...will continue later)
Send stream format
Btrfs send stream has its own format. All data are stored in little endian.
The example output can be generated by the following command:
# btrfs subvolume create /mnt/btrfs/subv1 # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs/subv1 /mnt/btrfs/ro_snap # btrfs send -f output /mnt/btrfs/ro_snap
The stream is consisit of the following part:
- Send stream header
- One or more send commands
Send stream header
|0||13||char||Send magic header, "btrfs-stream" with terminating "\0"|
|13||4||u32||Send version, only 0x1 is supported yet|
Send command is consist of 2 parts:
- Send command header
- Send command data
- Which is one or more send tlv objects.
Send command header
Offset are only offset inside the structure.
|0||4||u32||Command size, excluing command header itself|
|4||2||u16||Command type, Check btrfs_send_command in kernel send.h for all types|
|6||4||char||CRC32 checksum, including the header, with checksum filled with 0.|
Send TLV header
TLV means Type Lenght Value. Offset are only offset inside the structure.
|0||2||u16||TLV type, check anonymous enum about send attributes in kernel send.h for all types|
|2||2||u16||TLV length, excludes TLV header itself.|
|4||Variable||Variable||Data, little endian|
Here is a list of things that need to be done:
- Currently, incremental sends where large directories get deleted are extremely slow. The reason is, that we can't rmdir the directory until all its items are deleted. In most cases, these items get deleted after we process the directory inode, so we need to check if a rmdir is possible for every deleted directory item that we encounter later. To check this, we currently iterate the whole dir and check if the items found there were already processed. If we detect that all have been processed, we know that we can do a rmdir now. This is extremely slow on large directories. A possible solution would be to have a "rmdir cache" which holds a "pending unlink count" for each directory that is pending for rmdir. We then decrement the count every time we encounter an inode that gets deleted from the pending dir. If it reaches 0, we can safely send a rmdir instruction.
- The same as for deleted directories could be done for newly created directories. In case we encounter an inode with an inum smaller than the inum of the parent, we need to iterate the parent dir to find out if the parent was already created out of order. We could speed this up with a cache.
- For the full send case, we could optimize sending of preallocated extents and dummy extents (disknr=0) by simply skipping them. Following writes/truncates will then create the same preallocated extents on the receiving side. We could probably do the same for incremental sends, but I don't know if there is a syscall to zero out the middle of a file and replace the extents with preallocated extents.
- Currently we send utimes every time a dir item is added/removed from a directory. This results in many unnecessary utime updates. This could be optimized with the help of "delayed utime updates". Instead of calling send_utimes, we would then queue the update into a list and let later utime updates only update the queue entry. If the queue size reaches a threshold, we then send the oldest utime updates to user space and remove them from the list.
- More output formats? An idea was for example to add a shar like output format.
- A paranoid mode. Let btrfs send do a parallel temporary receive in the background and later compare the results to find out if we got a good stream. Probably only needed at the beginning while send/receive is experimental. Not sure if this is worth the extra work.
Send stream v2 draft
Missing from v1:
- send extent holes in files efficiently, use hole punching (was not available during v1 time)
- send preallocated extents properly
- extent clones within one file
Implemented in v2, scheduled for merge:
- extend ioctl to produce v1 or v2 formats
- stream version recognition
- send otime for inodes
- send encoded data (compressed, encrypted)
- send file flags
- (FS_IOC_GETFLAGS/FS_IOC_SETFLAGS), the receiving side misses NOCOW and the other attributes like append-only, immutable etc.
- setting the flags on receiving side is tricky as the flags affects if/how the data are stored
- send progress
To implement outside of kernel:
- optionally generate uid/gid number:string mappings and provide them on receiving side to apply