Status

From btrfs Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(version)
(Overview: update editing)
Line 144: Line 144:
 
* '''Unstable''': do not use for other then testing purposes, known severe problems, missing implementation of some core part
 
* '''Unstable''': do not use for other then testing purposes, known severe problems, missing implementation of some core part
  
'''Note to editors:''' please update the table if:
+
'''Note to editors:'''
* you're sure you know the answer, eg. a bug number for a bug that lowers the feature status
+
 
 +
This page reflects status of the whole project and edits need to be approved by one of the maintainers ([[User:kdave]]).
 +
Suggest edits if:
 +
 
 +
* there's a known missing entry
 
* a particular feature combination that has a different status and is worth mentioning separately
 
* a particular feature combination that has a different status and is worth mentioning separately
* there's a missing entry (put TBD to the status)
+
* you knouw of a bug that lowers the feature status
 
* a reference could be enhanced by an actual link to documentation (wiki, manual pages)
 
* a reference could be enhanced by an actual link to documentation (wiki, manual pages)
 
The page edits are watched by wiki admins, do not worry to edit.
 
  
 
== Details that do not fit the table ==
 
== Details that do not fit the table ==

Revision as of 12:38, 5 June 2017

Note: this page is protected and cannot be edited by all users: edits must be approved, this page reflects status of the whole project


Contents

Overview

For a list of features by their introduction, please see the table Changelog#By_feature.

The table below aims to serve as an overview for the stability status of the features BTRFS supports. While a feature may be functionally safe and reliable, it does not necessarily mean that its useful, for example in meeting your performance expectations for your specific workload.

The table is based on the latest released linux kernel (4.11):

Feature Status Notes
Performance
Trim (aka. discard) OK fstrim and mounted with -o discard (has performance implications)
Autodefrag OK
Defrag mostly OK extents get unshared (see below)
Compression & deduplication
Compression mostly OK (needs verification and source) auto-repair and compression may crash
Out-of-band dedupe mostly OK performance issues
File range cloning mostly OK (reflink), heavily referenced extents have a noticeable performance hit
Reliabillity
Auto-repair OK automatically repair from a correct spare copy if possible (dup, raid1, raid10)
Scrub OK
Scrub + RAID56 Unstable will verify but not repair
nodatacow OK Nodatacow does not checksum data, see Manpage/btrfs(5).
Device replace mostly OK gets stuck on devices with bad sectors
Balance OK
Block group profile
Single (block group profile) OK
DUP (block group profile) OK
RAID0 OK
RAID1 mostly OK Needs at least two available devices always. Can get stuck in irreversible read-only mode if only one device is present.

[1] [2]

RAID10 mostly OK Needs to be able to create two copies always. Can get stuck in irreversible read-only mode if only one copy can be made.

[3] [4]

RAID56 Unstable write hole still exists, parity not checksummed
Mixed block groups OK see documentation
Administration
Filesystem resize OK shrink, grow
Offline UUID change OK
Subvolumes, snapshots OK
Send OK corner cases may still exist
Receive OK
Seeding OK should be better documented
Quotas, qgroups mostly OK
Misc
Free space tree mostly OK see below
no-holes OK see documentation for compatibility
skinny-metadata OK see documentation for compatibility
extended-refs OK see documentation for compatibility

Legend:

  • OK: should be safe to use, no known defficiencies
  • mostly OK: safe for general use, there are some known problems
  • Unstable: do not use for other then testing purposes, known severe problems, missing implementation of some core part

Note to editors:

This page reflects status of the whole project and edits need to be approved by one of the maintainers (User:kdave). Suggest edits if:

  • there's a known missing entry
  • a particular feature combination that has a different status and is worth mentioning separately
  • you knouw of a bug that lowers the feature status
  • a reference could be enhanced by an actual link to documentation (wiki, manual pages)

Details that do not fit the table

Defrag

The data affected by the defragmentation process will be newly written and will consume new space, the links to the original extents will not be kept. See also Manpage/btrfs-filesystem. Though autodefrag affects newly written data, it can read a few adjacent blocks (up to 64k) and write the contiguous extent to a new location. The adjacent blocks will be unshared. This happens on a smaller scale than the on-demand defrag and doesn't have the same impact.

Free space tree

  • btrfs-progs support is read-only, ie. fsck can check the filesystem but is not able to keep the FST consistent and thus cannot run in repair mode
  • the free space tree can be cleared using 'btrfs check --clear-space-cache v2' and will be rebuilt at next mount

Compatibility and historical references:

  • btrfs-progs versions before v4.7.3 might accidentally do writes to the filesystem, but since there's no way to invalidate the FST, this causes inconsistency and possible corruption (using a piece of space twice). If you have made changes (btrfstune, repair, ...) to a FST enabled filesystem with btrfs progs, then mount with clear_cache,space_cache=v2 and hope the space written to was not reused yet. (see Status of free-space-tree feature)
  • (fixed in linux 4.9) runtime support: fine on little-endian machines (x86*), known to be broken on big-endian (sparc64), see sparc64: btrfs module fails to load on big-endian machines

Other

On-disk format

The filesystem disk format is stable. This means it is not expected to change unless there are very strong reasons to do so. If there is a format change, filesystems which implement the previous disk format will continue to be mountable and usable by newer kernels.

The core of the on-disk format that comprises building blocks of the filesystem:

  • layout of the main data structures, eg. superblock, b-tree nodes, b-tree keys, block headers
  • the COW mechanism, based on the original design of Ohad Rodeh's paper "Shadowing and clones"

Newly introduced features build on top of the above and could add specific structures. If a backward compatibility is not possible to maintain, a bit in the filesystem superblock denotes that and the level of incompatibility (full, read-only mount possible).

Personal tools