Talk:Status
From btrfs Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→parity not checksummed removed) |
Marios Titas (Talk | contribs) (→Degraded mount fixes in 4.14: new section) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: We had some discussions how to move forward with raid56, the parity checksum was found to be not necessary so I removed it from the list as a problem to fix. --[[User:Kdave|Kdave]] ([[User talk:Kdave|talk]]) 21:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC) | : We had some discussions how to move forward with raid56, the parity checksum was found to be not necessary so I removed it from the list as a problem to fix. --[[User:Kdave|Kdave]] ([[User talk:Kdave|talk]]) 21:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Degraded mount fixes in 4.14 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The page mentions an issue with degraded mounts where you can get stuck in irreversible read-only mode. If I am not mistaken, the issue has been fixed by the commits 21634a19 & 4330e183 which have been included in the 4.14 kernel. Isn't this the case? |
Revision as of 01:08, 16 November 2018
parity not checksummed removed
On Feb 27, kdave removed the "parity not checksummed" note for RAID56. Was this change made in Kernel 4.16? I don't see the word parity in Dave's pull request for that kernel. Is this just hiding in there under a different name? Or was it fixed earlier? Thanks Bobpaul (talk) 20:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- We had some discussions how to move forward with raid56, the parity checksum was found to be not necessary so I removed it from the list as a problem to fix. --Kdave (talk) 21:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Degraded mount fixes in 4.14
The page mentions an issue with degraded mounts where you can get stuck in irreversible read-only mode. If I am not mistaken, the issue has been fixed by the commits 21634a19 & 4330e183 which have been included in the 4.14 kernel. Isn't this the case?